Shute,6 forum clauses are not without their inadequacies. Find great deals and specials on caribbean, the bahamas, alaska, and mexico cruises. Legal issues relevant to cruise ships cruise research. Book an eligible stateroom on any qualifying sailing and receive a free upgrade. A summary and case brief of carnival cruise lines, inc. Shute attached and be ready to discuss same during the first class session. All shore excursions sold through carnival are coordinated with reputable tour operators and include all of the most popular sites of interest. The forumselection clause, as printed in the ticketpassenger contract, mandated that. The washington supreme court, in turn, held that jurisdiction over defendant existed under washingtons long arm statute, see shute v.
Plaintiffs eulala and russell shute appeal the district courts decision to grant the. Start studying business law exam 1 auburn university cochran. The entire wikipedia with video and photo galleries for each article. The plaintiffs, eulala and russel shute, were passengers on a cruise ship operated by the defendant. After the respondents shute, a washington state couple, purchased passage on a ship owned by petitioner, a floridabased cruise line, petitioner sent them tickets containing a clause designating courts in florida as the. Federal court to decide on blocking carnival ships from u. Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit syllabus. Lerner v karageorgis56 ad3d at 120 lines, 66 ny2d 479, 484485 1985.
Shute forum selection clauses in maritime contracts. Carnivals great vacation guarantee were 100% certain youre going to have a great time. Carnivals shore excursion program carnival cruise lines. The respondents, the shutes, was a couple from the state of washington that purchased cruise tickets through a local travel agent for a 7day cruise on the petitioners ship, the tropicale. The shutes bought cruise tickets through a travel agent in washington. Carnival splendor cruise ship details dream vacations. Supreme court holds forum selection clauses are generally enforceable.
Appellants eulala and russel shute are washington residents who purchased ocean cruise fares from carnival through a snohomish county travel agency in march 1986. Carnival cruise deals and cruise packages to the most popular destinations. Last term, the supreme court in carnival cruise lines, inc. Ports on june 24 by daniel mccarthy april 12, 2019 the court is alleging carnival corp. Course materials will be available for purchase at the law library copy center located in room b207. Justia blawg search law blogs, lawyer blogs, legal blogs. Jun 07, 20 shute was injured while on the cruise off the coast of mexico, brought suit against carnival, but carnival had a clause in their tickets that all litigation would be handled in floridathere principal place of business. Apr 12, 2019 federal court to decide on blocking carnival ships from u. Forumselection clauses and the privitization of procedure. The agent then forwarded the money to florida where carnival was based.
Carnival s contacts with the state of washington are insufficient to support an exercise of general jurisdiction. Carnival has no offices and no exclusive agents in washington, it is not registered to do business there, and it. However, any criticism that the test reaches too far is answered by the federal courts tempering of its but for test with an additional. Shute slipped and fell on a deck mat on a carnival cruise ship off the coast of mexico. A qualitative study of victimization and legal issues relevant to cruise ships caitlin e. The terms and conditions in dickson productions website. Carnival cruise lines inc v shute brief free downloads, list 1 download carnival cruise lines inc v shute brief software.
Carnival does not offer any alternatives from the established shore excursion program. Forum selection clauses carnival cruise lines, inc. After the respondents shute, a washington state couple, purchased passage on a ship owned by petitioner, a floridabased cruise line, petitioner sent them. The united states district court for the western district of washington defendant ant justice blackmun v. May 17, 2004 this is so when the agreement concerns venue within a judicial system, see carnival cruise lines, inc. Shutes o assented to the provisions of the contract of the forumselection. Visit dream vacations today to book your next cruise. Not only is the decision profoundly anticonsumer, but it bears no conceivable relationship to the way real people live. Consistent with this task and guidelines, this essay suggest that hands down incontestably, carnival cruise lines, inc.
Shute handily wins the honor as the worst nonobvious, nonconstitutional supreme court decision ever. Carnival cruise lines united states district court, n. Lower court united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. Participating in a shore excursion is the best way to ensure our guests get the most out of their visit to each portofcall. The issue is whether or not the forum selection clause is enforceable, as contained in the passage contract ticket of carnival cruise lines. Uncertainty requires an indepth inquiry into forumselection clause enforceability issues, 17 brooklyn j. Shute located in the cheeseman textbook on page 58 assume your readers know the facts of the case and are only seeking your opinions on whether or not ticket contracts and ticket stubs are fair to the consumer. Carnival argues that plaintiffs tickets contain a florida selection clause the enforceability of which was recently upheld by the supreme court in carnival cruise lines, inc. Shute1 handily wins the honor as the worst nonobvious, nonconstitutional supreme court decision ever. I agree that interconnect gmbh, as general representative of carnival cruise line, may save and use my data for sending newsletters. The nevada law journal is a legal scholarship publication run by unlv law school students, dedicated to providing law and policy analysis. That ticket form, which consisted of three pages of smallish print, had been sent to the shutes after they made their reservations and paid the fare. She and her husband then sued the carnival cruise line, alleging negligence by carnival s employees and seeking damages for her. Burke university of florida abstract the purpose of this project was to conduct a qualitative study examining the litigation process of u.
The plaintiff had made reservations through a massachusetts travel. The paper carnival cruise lines v shute et vir case is a brilliant example of a case study on law. Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit 586 richard k. Carnival cruise injury claim miami boat accident lawyer. She and her husband then sued the carnival cruise line, alleging. Upon her return home, shute filed suit in the united states district court for the western district of washington. In 1991, the united state supreme court made several rulings that remain the law today porter, 2006, p. The contract which was attached to the ticket stated that the forum for litigation would be florida. Order the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in carnival cruise lines inc. According to the us supreme courts decision in the case, carnival cruise lines, inc. Forumselection clauses forcing individuals to agree to submit to jurisdiction in a particular place. Forumselection clauses forcing individuals to agree to submit to jurisdiction in a particular place are enforceable so long as they pass the test.
Shute was injured while on the cruise off the coast of mexico, brought suit against carnival, but carnival had a clause in their tickets that all litigation would be handled in floridathere principal place of business. The titanic of worst decisions, nevada law journal. Civil procedure 109 consent as a substitute for power carnival cruise lines, inc. The ticket that she had purchased contained a passenger contract with a forum selection clause, providing that florida would be the forum for any disputes arising from the contract. She brought a personal injury claim in washington, where she was a resident. In this admiralty case we primarily consider whether the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit correctly refused to enforce a forum selection clause contained in tickets issued by petitioner carnival cruise lines, inc. Business law exam 1 auburn university cochran flashcards. The shutes had purchased carnival cruise tickets in washington through a travel agent. Shute, live in the state of washington and they had purchased passage for a pleasure cruise on a ship owned by the petitioner, carnival cruise lines. In this admiralty case we primarily consider whether the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit correctly refused to enforce a forumselection clause contained in tickets issued by petitioner carnival cruise lines, inc. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. The validity of the terms of a contract for a cruise turn on federal principles of maritime law see carnival cruise lines, inc. Carnival cruise lines v shute et vir case study example.
Its logo is the funnel like the funnels found on its ships, with red, white, and blue colors. Carnival, is a panamanian corporation with its principal place of business in florida. Carnival cruise line is an international cruise line with headquarters in doral, florida. Elliott elliott filed plaintiffs original complaint and request for class certification, seeking relief from defendants carnival cruise lines and carnival corporation carnival for alleged damages he and other passengers suffered resulting from a truncated or terminated carnival cruise. From gaming lessons for beginners to establishing credit lines and betting. On the ticket, there was a forum selection clause that said any litigation related to the cruise must be tried in florida. Carnival players club the carnival players club is a unique casino program that offers something for every level of player. Shute3 upheld the validity of the clause, requiring mrs. Illinois, eastern division 24 jan, 2001 24 jan, 2001. Share with the friend who loves the view from the main atrium. Carnival s shore excursion program visiting our exotic ports of call is half the fun of going on a fun ship cruise and we offer optional shore excursions at every port. Knapp being no expert in the niceties of constitutional law, my first impulse was to decline the invitation to take part in this symposium devoted to decisions of. Forumselection clauses forcing individuals to agree to submit to jurisdiction in a particular place are enforceable so long as they pass the test for judicial fairness.
Sep 18, 20 the cruise ship way carnival cruise lines, inc. Knapp being no expert in the niceties of constitutional law, my first impulse was to decline the invitation to take part in this symposium devoted to decisions of the united states supreme court. The defendantappellee, carnival cruise lines, is a panamanian. On the back of the tickets was a forumselection clause, stating that all disputes should be litigated in the state of florida.
Shute, carnival and other cruise lines have discretion to litigate in florida because the corporation is headquartered and operates there. Carnival cruise lines inc v shute brief free download at. After the respondents shute, a washington state couple, purchased passage on a ship owned by petitioner, a floridabased cruise line, petitioner sent them tickets containing a clause designating courts in florida as the agreedupon fora for the resolution of disputes. One of the many benefits of booking excursions through carnival is a guarantee that the ship will remain in port. Mullenix hands down incontestably, carnival cruise lines, inc.
33 829 1379 893 729 632 1174 1463 1152 1180 231 192 672 440 91 1464 195 1351 357 1166 262 1249 1589 390 1044 256 136 946 391 1028 25 1430 1238 1005 106 150 715 1492 504 283 272 469 554 779 161 309